Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco 40-165
#16

Once again your expertise is invaluable.
The power transformer secondary resistance reads a little low.  The schematic has half the secondary at 420 ohms and the other half at 400 ohms.  I get about 300 ohms on one side and about 345 ohms on the other.  The primary reads 18 ohms just as the schematic says it should and the filament windings read <.1 ohm.  Should it be replaced or is it within tolerance?

Einstein once said, "I have no special talents, I am only passionately curious."

Jim
#17

Wouldn't lose any sleep over it. Would measure the ac voltage @ the rectifier plates (without the rectifier in place) to see if it's close. Then leave it on for a little while to see if the transformer get hot.

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry
#18

I have searched for a 270 ohm resistor the schematic calls shows, however, no matter how many times I trace the old wiring I come back to a 470 ohm resistor that looks as if it was put in after manufacture.  The soldering on the leads is shiny and sloppy.  The after market notes I have do not indicate a change however my notes are probably incomplete.  Should I replace the 470 with a 470 or replace it with a 270 the schematic indicates?
Thanks...Jim
#19

For now I'd leave it. What it does is set the - bias voltage for the 41 and 7C6. THe important part is when you get it working measure the - voltage on pin 4 of the 41. RCA sez you need about -15vdc there. If you lower the resistance you will low the amount of bias voltage. If you do change it you'll need a 3-5watt job to replace it.

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco model 60
Yes, standard alignment procedure. I can get the minuscule tone to vary when adjusting the trimmers. But you almost have...Radios1340 — 01:40 PM
A Marconi model 86
An imposing-looking radio, for sure.morzh — 12:43 PM
Philco model 60
Model 60 struck again :lol: Welcome to the Phorum! Above is the article on Model 60. Could be of some use. Now...morzh — 12:38 PM
A Marconi model 86
Ooh, very nice!jrblasde — 12:19 PM
A Marconi model 86
I am picking up this radio today. The seller tells me it is all there and working.including the tuning eye. It has 13 tu...Dan Walker — 12:07 PM
Philco model 60
Hi guys! I’m a new member here but have been using your resources for quite some time. Hopefully I can get some help wit...Radios1340 — 11:52 AM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Milkjug plastic?morzh — 09:36 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Yep. 'Cause when I heard "buibble" I immediately thought of this and started wondering how this poly...morzh — 09:33 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Blister Pack, that's what I was trying to remember!RodB — 09:29 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
In the packaging biz we refer to the package as a clamshell or blister pack if on a cardboard. So we are using the packa...Paul Philco322 — 08:13 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 4487 online users. [Complete List]
» 3 Member(s) | 4484 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatarAvatar

>