Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

I need a good picture of the Patent Label for a 38-7
#1

I took a picture of the label on my chassis but when I needed it to reproduce a new label, the picture was blurry! I need to be more careful. Can anybody either post a close up or email me a picture of the patent label? Much appreciated.

Crist
#2

Hi Crist,

Any chance it's the same as the 37-xxx models?

I had this photo of the patent label on my 37-116:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B64cfW...DhaNkJadEk

Here's a repro label I created from it:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B64cfW...1VyOEFybm8

[Edit: links have been fixed]
#3

Nathan,
No, it is not the same. I have your label already which I used for my 60B project. It worked very well. what I did was to scan it as a jpeg and then reworked it slightly to have the correct part number. I'll do the same for the 38-7. Except the picture was to blurry to read the numbers! That's why I need a clear picture of the label.
Your stuff is top notch and much appreciated in our hobby. thanks again.

Crist
#4

Oh - that's right. I remember now about your 60B.  Icon_thumbup

So I looked through photos I've saved from various models - found this picture of the patent label from a 38-12:
   

Can you get what you need from that?

And wow you need a magnifying glass to read it - no wonder it's hard to find a good picture of one.
#5

That's it! Thanks. Yeah, a better picture would be great. At least it's a start.
Thanks.

Crist
#6

Hi Christ,
Here is the label off of my 38-7.  It has a lot of brown stains that I can't wipe of, I suspect the paper is stained.  Also, as luck would have it, last week I pushed on the one spot where there is a hollow under the label, and that created the circular tear in the middle.  So I don't know if this is much help, but it definitely is a 37-8.
Let me know if the photo doesn't comes through, I've never posted a photo before.


Attached Files Image(s)
   
#7

Yeah, the picture came through! That's it. I'll use this one as my seed and see what I can come up with.
Thanks.

Crist




Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
The speaker table error?
G  10-1/2"       65, 76, 87, 95 Push-Pull 45's 2766 0.7 550 3200 H   10-1/2"    77, 96 Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM
Philco model 60
I'm also a member of MARC. Did you attend the Vintage Electronics Expo in Waterford, MI last month? That's where I got...GarySP — 07:22 PM
A Marconi model 86
Dan Double conversion is using two IF converters instead of one. This improves the image response. morzh — 07:15 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>