Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

37-630 Filter caps 60 and 62 backwards on schematic?
#1

Working on a 37-630T chassis and noticed the filter caps 60 and 62 seemed backwards on the schematic.  Searched this forum and found thread saying it was in fact incorrect and was corrected in Service Bulletin 251.  Can't find SB 251 to verify.  About to solder new caps in place and want to make sure before committing.  Anyone know for sure?

Not sure how to add link, if successful it will take you to page where 37-630 schematic is.
Thank you

http://www.audiophool.com/Philco.html

Oh! That was easy.  Icon_crazy
#2

Their sch are in dejavu format; not everyone could see it.
Judging by 620 here
http://www.nostalgiaair.org/pagesbymodel...013212.pdf

yes it seem like they flipped the symbols.
But no one in their right mind will not connect the filter cap minus side up anyway.
I restored 620 two years ago, did not even notice that.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#3

Tks Morzh.  What got me concerned and paranoid was I finished up a I think it was a 38-60 and one of the filter caps was properly "backwards"  + to CT so remembering that I began to second guess.  Been many years since I retired from Navy elec job.  It's coming back but it is good to have a source of knowledge here on the forum.  TKs again.
Tt
#4

No, what you probably are talking about is the cap that in 620 is #68 (though it is not electrolytic here, but in some radio it is).
This cap is always placed with its plus to GND because the other side is the rectifier's negative which is always more negative than the GND (it is in fact the most negative point in the whole radio).

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#5

Yep it's been awhile but that sounds about right.  TKs and I appreciate your time.
Tt




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
The wires were desoldered from the can, and the capacitors checked. All checked at 0.102 uF, which is correct. So the c...morzh — 09:41 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Arran Yours probably then the H speaker, same as mine.morzh — 08:39 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike; I would like to have a look at the speaker in my model 96, but the set is packed into a corner in the basement. ...Arran — 08:04 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
Thanks Arran, I'm convinced the power cord is good but have a nice repro plug for it. Would it be prudent to add a fus...RealRider — 07:28 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
As I was studying this schematic I was wondering what does this dotted line means?  I haven't traced it out yet. An o...RealRider — 07:22 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
When it comes to the cloth covered power cords, if they are not frayed, and are flexible, and if I can bend one without ...Arran — 06:21 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Could be. The central cylinder is OK, but the sides are...well. What's done is done. I wonder if some standard bobbine w...morzh — 06:02 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike; As I was saying it doesn't look like they used much of a bobbin for the field coil, not like a Magnavox one wou...Arran — 05:49 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
This AK84 was bought, I think, last fall. For a whopping $100. It has been, according to the seller, restored. As I go ...morzh — 05:48 PM
Philco model 60
Plus I forgot that I have a spare complete Philco FC speaker, that would work perfectly, now that I don’t need it. Got i...Radios1340 — 05:36 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 2493 online users. [Complete List]
» 2 Member(s) | 2491 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatar

>