Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

10 mfd in place of a 6
#1

is that too much? i would use a 8 if i could find one in my stock.
#2

Ur fine.

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry
#3

I'm just trying to be careful my mentor from years ago always told me never go to high in capacitance when replacing electrolytics.
#4

It is possible to raise the B+ in doing this, though generally not a problem. The other issue might be exceeding the rating on the rectifier for a first filter cap such as 10uf for an 80. In this case I would not anticipate any problems.

"I just might turn into smoke, but I feel fine"
http://www.russoldradios.com/
#5

Depends where. If it's the first filter cap, the B+ will go up, though as Russ said it is not necessarily a problem. The second cap (usually after the field coil) it is not critical at all, wthin reason - the more the better (they probably would use more but at the time larger values were not as widely available).

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#6

Well since i read the schematic wrong and this is a 25-40 cycle not the 60 set the first cap is a 10 mfd and the audio is a 6 mfd. So a 10 will be fine.
#7

Jake, your radio is “now” a 60 cycle set. Having said that, 10 uf will still be fine.

Steve

M R Radios   C M Tubes
#8

...by that, Steve means that your 50-A will now be operating on 60 cycle (60 Hz) AC. So don't stress it. Icon_smile

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#9

Sounds good i hope it likes a pair of 10/10 @ 450
#10

Wow,,long time ,,,RON,,,,soo glad you are still watching all us Kids,,,,,Hope you feel some--what better ,,My Friend




Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Hello Mike, Wow ! far as my AK it does work and the cabinet is in nice shape so is my chassis anyway here is a photo of...radiorich — 02:59 AM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Nice radio, Mike! Here's hoping it was well rebuilt. Take care and BE HEALTHY! GaryGarySP — 12:12 AM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Rich yes, this is the way I got it. I have just put it on the table and took it apart. I suspect it even might work,...morzh — 11:31 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Hello mike, What nice looking radio I have one AK in my collection it's a console I have not started restoring it yet ....radiorich — 11:21 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
Just to make it more confusing here is another model 91 schematic that doesn't show parts with dotted lines in that spot...Arran — 10:37 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
The wires were desoldered from the can, and the capacitors checked. All checked at 0.102 uF, which is correct. So the c...morzh — 09:41 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Arran Yours probably then the H speaker, same as mine.morzh — 08:39 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike; I would like to have a look at the speaker in my model 96, but the set is packed into a corner in the basement. ...Arran — 08:04 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
Thanks Arran, I'm convinced the power cord is good but have a nice repro plug for it. Would it be prudent to add a fus...RealRider — 07:28 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
As I was studying this schematic I was wondering what does this dotted line means?  I haven't traced it out yet. An o...RealRider — 07:22 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 3930 online users. [Complete List]
» 3 Member(s) | 3927 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatarAvatar

>