Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

46-200 Resistors Question
#1

Philco 46-200 restoration project.    Ready to dive in.  

All caps will be replaced.   But I have a couple of newby questions about resistors:

1.  If a given resistor tests within specs (taking into account whether it's a 20% or 10% tolerance resistor), should I leave it in place?   In other words, replace only the bad ones?

2.  I know that changes were made throughout the production run on this radio, but mine has a resistor or two where the schematics (and subsequent production change notes) don't show one; and conversely, it is missing a resistor or two where the schematic says there should be one.    When it comes to the resistors, should I restore the radio strictly to the schematic?   Or should I restore it to "as found" configuration?

I should mention that it works as is, meaning it picks up stations and has good volume.

I should also mention that it looks like it has had a minimum of tampering -- I really suspect it left the factory with the resistor configuration it has now.  BUT I'm pretty new to this...   so I'm asking the gurus.
#2

Considering the radio works, I would match what is found in the chassis.

I normally don't replace resistors that are in spec. My thinking is that replacement may be more traumatic (mechanical and thermal) to the radio than any benefit.

Others have mentioned that if the resistor measures at the high end of the tolerance, it may have started at the low end of the tolerance and drifted it's way up. There is no way of knowing and it would be good to replace these resistors.
#3

Thank you!




Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike, Lookup  murrayatuptown on ARF. Seems he has a dilemma with surplus field coils. Could get lucky and have what y...Chas — 01:26 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Hello Mike, I have not checked to see if my console has a fuse or not and far as sets go I have early 30s General Motor...radiorich — 11:25 AM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Ron I forgot, but when you said "phone number", I remembered, caus I usually remember how I act when I need...morzh — 11:12 AM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
You have an extensive collection of Philcos, Mike! I’m always excited to see each new one. Agreed on the power supply fu...jrblasde — 10:50 AM
462ron
Hi Mike, that 84 sure looks great. You don’t often see these antique radios with a fuse like yours has. I usually instal...462ron — 10:22 AM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Hello Mike, Wow ! far as my AK it does work and the cabinet is in nice shape so is my chassis anyway here is a photo of...radiorich — 02:59 AM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Nice radio, Mike! Here's hoping it was well rebuilt. Take care and BE HEALTHY! GaryGarySP — 12:12 AM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Rich yes, this is the way I got it. I have just put it on the table and took it apart. I suspect it even might work,...morzh — 11:31 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Hello mike, What nice looking radio I have one AK in my collection it's a console I have not started restoring it yet ....radiorich — 11:21 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
Just to make it more confusing here is another model 91 schematic that doesn't show parts with dotted lines in that spot...Arran — 10:37 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 4236 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 4235 Guest(s)
Avatar

>