Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco 366 Canadian/66
#1

ÛPicked this working radio up at an estate sale.  It's a cathedral.  Since it was working, I'd thought I'd just recap and replace out of tolerance resistors.  I've run into a problem I need advice on.  The wax cap in the picture goes from Bakelite block #26 and ties into #2 pin in output tube #42.  Where it sits is right behind mica cap #30.  However, on the schematic and the base view drawing it clearly is not original and was added.  I "thought" the caps in that Bakelite were mica.  I ordered two 100pF@500V mica from Just Radios just in case they were needed to replace but ...now I'm wondering if it was added because the Bakelite block was failing and if so, did I get the correct replacements?  I've never seen a wax cap installed to support a failing mica anyway. Any thoughts on this are greatly appreciated. The cap is marked 30-4024-m.
Thanks,
Mark


Attached Files Image(s)
           
#2

Another thought...perhaps it was added to booster the failing pot of the tone control, since that ties into pin 2 of the output tube. I was to replace those anyway. Perhaps they used th block as a ground?
Mark
#3

Philcos from that era don't use tone control pots, if it has a pot, with a cap going to B+, it's been modified. The model 66 was a modified version of a model 60, with a proper shortwave band, the tone control was only a two position switch. If I were going to put a tone control pot in anything I would use one of the many circuits where you are NOT shunting a capacitor between B+ and ground through a pot, the cap shorts out, and BBQ's the tone control pot.
Regards
Arran
#4

Hey Mark,
It appears the cap is attached to the ground terminal of the bakelite block. The other end is on pin 2 of the 42 which is the plate. I think the cap is there because there might be a problem with the tone control caps located inside the can of the tone control. I would remove the cap and replace the ones in the tone control can.
#5

It's a pot of tar and it's been added on as you can see from the electrical tape.  The blue wire goes to pin 2 of the output tube #42.  On the schematic it shows 2 caps which are described in the schematic parts list as "Condensers in Tone Control".  There is only one contact post on the tone control and after I get the tar out of it I'll take a closer look at that glob of solder which I'm wondering is a grounding point.  The other picture is a proposed sketch of how I planned to replace those two caps.  At this point I'll assume when the new pot was added it needed that "extra" cap I originally referenced and asked about.  If I follow the schematic and replace the correct value caps which I have, I would then remove that extra cap (30-4024-m).  If all this sounds kosher, is the proposed wiring diagram right?
Thanks,
Mark


Attached Files Image(s)
       
#6

Looks good, as capacitance is added to the circuit through the tone switch the effect is to filter off some high frequency audio giving more bass to the output transformer. It goes from 0.002mfd to 0.022mfd. I wouldn't go any higher, you may start to lose some lows and volume.
#7

Thanks! The last thing I'm questioning is voltage. I ordered two brown dip caps@630v. For the tone control caps. Let me know if you would have done different.
Appreciate the help,
Mark
#8

That's what I use. Some will say 1000 volts but we aren't using these all the time at high volume, so I'm good with 630.
#9

Thank you!




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco 49-1040
I thought I had an arrangement to restore this set for a customer but his wife said heck no.  Instead, he gave it to me....Bob Andersen — 10:29 PM
Philco 46-480 Electronic Restoration
I kept working on reassembly this week. I wasn’t able to solder for a few days while it was too cold (single digit low t...jrblasde — 09:27 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Well, powering it up would be too good to be true, and I had that feeling. Before I did, I decided to check the coils...morzh — 06:02 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Thanks Chas, sure will give it a look!morzh — 03:39 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike, Lookup  murrayatuptown on ARF. Seems he has a dilemma with surplus field coils. Could get lucky and have what y...Chas — 01:26 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Hello Mike, I have not checked to see if my console has a fuse or not and far as sets go I have early 30s General Motor...radiorich — 11:25 AM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Ron I forgot, but when you said "phone number", I remembered, caus I usually remember how I act when I need...morzh — 11:12 AM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
You have an extensive collection of Philcos, Mike! I’m always excited to see each new one. Agreed on the power supply fu...jrblasde — 10:50 AM
462ron
Hi Mike, that 84 sure looks great. You don’t often see these antique radios with a fuse like yours has. I usually instal...462ron — 10:22 AM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Hello Mike, Wow ! far as my AK it does work and the cabinet is in nice shape so is my chassis anyway here is a photo of...radiorich — 02:59 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>