Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

A Beginner's Journey: The Philco 40-190

I would advertise here for an output transformer. Also check out Playthings of the Past and John Kendall's site for your part.

It lives.



I'll work on the alignment later, after I inspect my signal generator; so far it would seem that the best thing to do would be to move the dial pointer about a half-inch on the string as that will bring the world into dial scale alignment. I may not even screw with it after that. Icon_smile

THANK YOU to all of you who walked me through my first radio!

Upon listening closely to my radio, it has a very low-volume but consistent 60 Hz (B-flat) hum coming out of the speaker, even with the volume all the way down. Is this normal, or indicative of needing the voice coil wires reversed?

Deckape, is the hum level changed at all by increasing the volume? If not, perhaps a little cathode to filament leak on one of the tubes in the audio output. The voice coil, a possibility if the wires were switched. If it has a hum bucking coil tied to the voice coil and things are turned around, it won't cut some of the induced hum from the field coil they have to be in opposition. Just my lame ideas. Congrats on getting this far!
Jerry

A friend in need is a pest!  Bill Slee ca 1970.

Agree, if the hum bucker winding is wired backwards you will get more not less hum. Can't hurt to reverse it and have a listen. All those old sets had some hum regardless. You can beef up the filter capacitors a little bit (say 10%) and as said, make sure your output tubes are not gassy, but there will still be a little hum or more likely interference from modern devices that simply didn't exist way back when.

Rectifiers will also cause a set to hum when they get weak....

I all but let the smoke out of the original rectifier by crossing a couple of wires in the rebuild--thankfully, I had a spare hanging about (And a Raytheon-branded tube, at that). The spare tested out stronger even to start with. I'll try swapping the wires out when I'm feeling adventurous (and have a few spare moments to devote to the pursuit). I guess I'm asking a bit of a useless question in wanting quantification when I'm the only one available to listen to the speaker. Icon_biggrin

All else fails, I'll swap the wires back.




Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM
Philco model 60
I'm also a member of MARC. Did you attend the Vintage Electronics Expo in Waterford, MI last month? That's where I got...GarySP — 07:22 PM
A Marconi model 86
Dan Double conversion is using two IF converters instead of one. This improves the image response. morzh — 07:15 PM
A Marconi model 86
Thanks Arran; I don't even know what a double conversion is, but i do have a good friend In Nova Scotia that would k...Dan Walker — 07:01 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>