Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Difference between PT-2 and 46-250
#1

What are the main changes in the schematic between the pre-war 1942 PT-2 transitone and the post-war 46-250 (besides the obvious different 35Z3 tube in the PT-2 and a 35Z5 in the 46-250)? I have a PT-2 I just got and want to have ready to give to a friend when he's in town next Saturday. I'm working off of an original Philco Service Bulletin with the schematic for the 46-250, as I don't have the complete schematic for a PT-2. One thing that puzzles me is that it appears certain capacitors are reversed between the two different models. I can't imagine Philco would've made that many changes to a relatively simple radio when everything else appears identical. Any thoughts from those who have had experience restoring these two different models would be most appreciated.

Greg V.
West Bend, WI
Member WARCI.org
#2

Try the schematic posted here:

http://www.nostalgiaair.org/PagesByModel...014125.pdf

Unless there was a different code number or production run this should be closer then the 46-250.
Regards
Arran
#3

Thanks, Arran. I have been working off of that NostalgiaAir version I printed out earlier, comparing the two, but it's missing the parts list (only one page) and isn't near as detailed as the 46-250 factory schematic. And since I had hoped to have this done by Saturday morning, there isn't time to order the correct one for the PT-2 through the mail from Chuck and still have enough time to do the work (this is an evening, after work project).

Greg V.
West Bend, WI
Member WARCI.org
#4

Why do you need the parts list? It looks like the N.A schematic does have the part values marked on the schematic, except maybe for resistors Wattages and capacitor voltage ratings. I can have a look in one of my books but when it comes to the budget sets like the Transitones, Philco often didn't bother giving as much detail. Is it a 42-PT2 or a 41-PT2?
Regards
Arran
#5

The small print with the values is kinda blurry for some items on the N.A. schematic, and I just thought having the parts list would be helpful to verify things. I suppose it really isn't neccessary.

Greg V.
West Bend, WI
Member WARCI.org
#6

Which part values do you need to know? I have a diagram for both the 41-PT2 and 42-PT2, near as I can tell the N.A schematic from Riders looks like it came out of the 1941 Philco book.
Regards
Arran




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Got it. Still did not get the "Bubble" part.morzh — 07:10 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
No Mike. Clear plastic from the packaging of items you buy at Home Depot, the ones you can't open without a hack saw or ...RodB — 05:48 PM
Philco 89 indicator light.
Well thankfully that did not happen.Jim Dutridge — 05:21 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Paul, thanks, Anything can help. Gary Thanks, lemme look! PS. Looked it up. They have kits and parts for mod...morzh — 02:45 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Paul, thanks, Anything can help. Gary Thanks, lemme look!morzh — 02:39 PM
46-1201 Trip Switch Spring
I deleted the other thread, as it was duplicate and did not have the photo. Please proceed with this one.morzh — 02:37 PM
46-1201 Trip Switch Spring
Hello, first post here, bear with me. I've been electronically refurbishing a 46-1201 that I received from a relative. ...ConcernedFeller — 01:46 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
I am late to this post, amazing amount of work for a speaker Mike. You must like the challenge. I have a speaker from an...Paul Philco322 — 01:04 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike, give this site a look for your spider. Can't hurt. Take care and BE HEALTHY! -GaryGarySP — 12:41 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Rod, Bubble packaging? The one I know (if you mean the large bubble type) is really thin. I have some at home. Is there...morzh — 12:23 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 10848 online users. [Complete List]
» 2 Member(s) | 10846 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatar

>