Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

38-7 nothing recieved below 950kc
#1

I just recapped and replace 2 bad tubes in my 38-7. I'm getting good reception in the 1300-1500 range on multiple stations, but when I move the dial below about 950 I get nothing, not even pops or static. Is this an alignment problem? I was told on another forum that it was possibly a short in the variable cap, but I'm not sure what to look for or how to fix the problem. I don't have a signal generator to align with either. Thanks for any help!
Mike
#2

Found the short, works good now. Still not nearly as good of reception on the lower half of the dial though.

Mike
#3

Mike

Have you aligned your radio to factory specs?

The low end AM alignment is very critical to good performance not only of the lower end of the AM band, but to the overall performance of the radio.

When aligning the low end AM trimmer, typically at 600 kc (although it is sometimes 580 kc in certain Philco models), the thing to remember is that you are NOT aligning so that the pointer points to exactly 60 on the dial!

Instead, you want to tune in the 600 kc signal on your radio. Then slowly adjust the trimmer. After adjusting the trimmer just a fraction, retune the radio, following the signal. If the signal becomes weaker, turn the trimmer in the opposite direction; again, just a fraction. Then, once again, retune the radio to the signal.

Repeat this process until you can not get the signal to get any stronger. When it begins to weaken again, stop and retrim to its strongest point.

This procedure is known as "rocking" the tuning condenser.

This ensures that the proper intermediate frequency (IF) signal is being sent to the IF circuitry, and thus is more important for that than for whether the set is exactly at 60 on the dial or not.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN




Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco 46-480 Electronic Restoration
Morning, Ron! Yep, that’s the Moyer I spoke with. They did say that they researched for any off-brand equivalents but di...jrblasde — 08:51 AM
462ron
Joseph, the Moyer Electronics I’m familiar with is in Pottsville, PA. Only a half hour from me. My dad used to to buy fr...462ron — 08:24 AM
Philco 46-480 Electronic Restoration
Thanks, everyone! I suppose I’ll keep these installed since I have them and they do fit. But moving forward I’ll know th...jrblasde — 07:57 AM
Philco 46-480 Electronic Restoration
Hello joseph, Here is the one that I use made by Vishay part no. VY2103M59Y5VS63V0. Anyway both Digi-Key and Mouser ca...radiorich — 01:34 AM
Philco 46-480 Electronic Restoration
Silly me, you are right! I read and wrote nF, but was thinking pF.jrblasde — 10:48 PM
Philco 46-480 Electronic Restoration
0.01uF and 10nF are the same capacitances :lol: Its the rating. Yours are rated to 500V and the Y2 are up to 300V. Obvi...morzh — 10:41 PM
Philco 46-480 Electronic Restoration
You’re right, yours are much smaller. I must admit that I ordered these without much regard to size. I ordered them back...jrblasde — 10:29 PM
What should I offer?
Thanks, that makes sense. I searched Hepplewhite on Google, and saw some fancy dining chairs.jrblasde — 10:23 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
My memory had not failed me when I was writing about those inductances. I found them, both 5.6mH and 10mH, both small ax...morzh — 10:21 PM
Philco 46-480 Electronic Restoration
Joseph, Yes you could do that too. But why did you choose to buy these conspicuously large capacitors? 10nF Y2 caps sho...morzh — 10:02 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 3420 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 3419 Guest(s)
Avatar

>