Posts: 76
Threads: 20
Joined: Oct 2010
City: Oskaloosa
State, Province, Country: KANSAS
I am starting on my 116PX. I noticed a large cap 3.0uf; can I use a 2.2uf for that of should I get a 3.0? Could I use a 3.0 e-cap? I have attached the link to the schematic but the cap in question does not have a part number, it is next to the 30K resistor part#97 on the drawing.
http://www.philcoradio.com/tech/images/116px.jpg
Thanks
Skip
Posts: 1,562
Threads: 56
Joined: Nov 2008
City: Sedona, AZ/Placentia/CA
Skip, I would think a 5mfd would work just dandy there and they are a common value.
Jerry
A friend in need is a pest! Bill Slee ca 1970.
Posts: 4,826
Threads: 54
Joined: Sep 2008
City: Sandwick, BC, CA
I would use a non polarized capacitor, or a pair of, since the value is small. I think you could pair a 1 uf with that 2.2 uf in parallel to make it a 3.2 uf.
Regards
Arran
Posts: 76
Threads: 20
Joined: Oct 2010
City: Oskaloosa
State, Province, Country: KANSAS
Thanks guys. I figured the value was not too critical, just wanted to confirm.
Posts: 16,317
Threads: 569
Joined: Oct 2011
City: Jackson
State, Province, Country: NJ
WHen I needed 3uF I pared 3.2uF and 1uF in parallel.
However I have just bought some I think 3.3uF which I intend to use in place of 3uF in the 37-116, which has both 2uF and 3uF values in it.
Posts: 2,353
Threads: 92
Joined: May 2010
City: Clayton, NC
3.2 and 1 in parallel will yield 4.2 mFd.
Caps in parallel are additive in nature.
Posts: 16,317
Threads: 569
Joined: Oct 2011
City: Jackson
State, Province, Country: NJ
Sorry, meant 2.2uF. (I kinda guessed they add when in parallel) data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bde8a/bde8af1fe702fc25020245eaf76edc8225aee5ca" alt="Icon_lol Icon_lol"
3.2uF value is not even standard; 3.3uF is.
Posts: 1,562
Threads: 56
Joined: Nov 2008
City: Sedona, AZ/Placentia/CA
I love this stuff. Why worry so much about getting an e-cap to the precise old value?
Going all the way to parallel caps? That is ugly! Just toss in a 5mfd and relax. It will work nice. Higher seldom will hurt where this is located.
Jerry
A friend in need is a pest! Bill Slee ca 1970.
Posts: 16,317
Threads: 569
Joined: Oct 2011
City: Jackson
State, Province, Country: NJ
Actually most of the places where those smaler values electrolyte caps are are not sensitive to higher value at all, the lower value being probably a budgetary consideration rather than electrical.
And the filtrer caps.....the one that probably should be observed is the very first one across the rectifier. The voltage will go up as you increase the value, and copupled with today's higher line voltage in the first place it will add that unnecessary extra we can do without. The one after the choke is less critical as it mostly affects the voltage when there is no load.
Posts: 1,106
Threads: 88
Joined: Jun 2011
City: Tacoma
State, Province, Country: Washington
That, and 'lytics are far from precise as far as tolerance is concerned. IIRC, the basic tolerances for 'lytics are something like -20/+100..
Posts: 2,353
Threads: 92
Joined: May 2010
City: Clayton, NC
Yes, that's true!
Just for grins, try testing your new caps on your cap checkers.
Posts: 16,317
Threads: 569
Joined: Oct 2011
City: Jackson
State, Province, Country: NJ
Well, the tolerance of the Panasonic caps I use is +/- 20% at 120Hz at room temp and I did test them and it is right on the money. Cheaper kind general purpose can be that +20/-80%. Though when you test them new at room temp they are rarely grossly outside 10%.
Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)
|
Recent Posts
|
91H Code 126 Restore
|
Hi Nick,
Usually the dashed lines connected to components means the part is a substitute in the circuit for specific ...RodB — 09:42 AM |
462ron
|
Mike when I got to the guy’s house to pick up the set, he gave me a tour of his home and garage. Wow, his living room co...462ron — 09:10 AM |
91H Code 126 Restore
|
I'm pretty sure that the dotted line I circled in an earlier post signifies that it is applicable to the 226 model which...RealRider — 08:05 AM |
Philco 49-1040
|
Hello bob,
that underside looks like it is all original !
Sincerely Richardradiorich — 02:07 AM |
Philco 49-1040
|
Oh yes, many bumblebees and loktal tubes.
The cutout is for the speaker. Here's a photo from a different set.
Bob Andersen — 12:59 AM |
Philco 49-1040
|
Bob;
Looks like another "Bumble Bee" special, like my Brand Z T.O radios. Is that section they took out of ...Arran — 12:19 AM |
Philco 49-1040
|
Hello Bob,
You are like the home for lost tv's like how people bring pets home !
Sincerely Richardradiorich — 12:00 AM |
Philco 49-1040
|
I thought I had an arrangement to restore this set for a customer but his wife said heck no. Instead, he gave it to me....Bob Andersen — 10:29 PM |
Philco 46-480 Electronic Restoration
|
I kept working on reassembly this week. I wasn’t able to solder for a few days while it was too cold (single digit low t...jrblasde — 09:27 PM |
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
|
Well, powering it up would be too good to be true, and I had that feeling.
Before I did, I decided to check the coils...morzh — 06:02 PM |
Who's Online
|
There are currently 2429 online users. [Complete List] » 3 Member(s) | 2426 Guest(s)
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00d17/00d175793acc78e93ba4255d4ab3e9188a10e078" alt=">"
|