Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

41-290 with an identity crisis
#1

Hi gang, long time lurker first-time poster.

I recently picked up what appears to be a 41-290 in rather good cosmetic/physical shape. The cabinet has gotten the Gojo treatment and cleaned up a treat. Repro escutcheon, buttons and knobs have been ordered and a packet from Chuck full of Philco Service Bulletin goodness has arrived.

My only puzzlement... the band indicator isn't what it should be, as best as I can tell. The chassis is missing it's ID tag and only has a serial number and patent tag. It is a 10-tube set doesn't appear to have been messed with much, if any, until I got it.

The 41-290 images I see everywhere else show separate lamps for the band indicators where mine has a single lamp in a movable housing. Also, there's an added dial cord drum on the external side of the band switch. The schematic sent by Chuck shows the separate lamps tied into the band switch and nothing about a single, mobile, lamp.

Photos here.

So... what have I got on my hands? The illegitimate son of a 290 and 287.. or a very late production 290?

Jeremy
#2

Hi and welcome!

It looks like a 41-290 to me. What makes you think otherwise? Philco did change the dial scale on later production 41-290 sets (and its siblings 41-250, 41-255, 41-280, 41-285, 41-287, 41-296).

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#3

Ah hah. The dim light has illuminated.

I found the change production notes in the packet of info and it does list a changed dial and band indicator. As I said, the only other images I could find showed the earlier production runs with the separate lamps, hence my confusion.

Crisis averted.
#4

Oh yeah, Philco changed from separate lamps used as band indicators to a single lamp operated mechanically early on, even before the glass dial was changed. Guess the bean counters at Philco decided that it cost too much to use individual lamps and sockets. Icon_rolleyes

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#5

Very nice radio, cleaned up really good! I like it!

Gregb




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco 49-1040
I thought I had an arrangement to restore this set for a customer but his wife said heck no.  Instead, he gave it to me....Bob Andersen — 10:29 PM
Philco 46-480 Electronic Restoration
I kept working on reassembly this week. I wasn’t able to solder for a few days while it was too cold (single digit low t...jrblasde — 09:27 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Well, powering it up would be too good to be true, and I had that feeling. Before I did, I decided to check the coils...morzh — 06:02 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Thanks Chas, sure will give it a look!morzh — 03:39 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike, Lookup  murrayatuptown on ARF. Seems he has a dilemma with surplus field coils. Could get lucky and have what y...Chas — 01:26 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Hello Mike, I have not checked to see if my console has a fuse or not and far as sets go I have early 30s General Motor...radiorich — 11:25 AM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Ron I forgot, but when you said "phone number", I remembered, caus I usually remember how I act when I need...morzh — 11:12 AM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
You have an extensive collection of Philcos, Mike! I’m always excited to see each new one. Agreed on the power supply fu...jrblasde — 10:50 AM
462ron
Hi Mike, that 84 sure looks great. You don’t often see these antique radios with a fuse like yours has. I usually instal...462ron — 10:22 AM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Hello Mike, Wow ! far as my AK it does work and the cabinet is in nice shape so is my chassis anyway here is a photo of...radiorich — 02:59 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>