Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

38-116 Input Transformer Info
#1

Hello Everyone!

It's been a couple of years since I've posted. I decided to re-visit my 38-116 since I've got it playing. I knew it did not have the correct output transformer but never paid much attention. I finally checked the  specs on the Hammond hx 126 series and it is only 4 watts.  I've read some posts here and see many go with the hx-125e or the hx1650f.  I chose the Edcor gxpp15-4-8k.   Looking at the specs of the original transformer the primary resistance is 7600 ohms. The Edcor is 8K. My question is will the extra 400 ohms cause any major changes in tone or clarity?  With the current transformer the radio sounds just ok, not much fidelity, volume up almost 1/2 way....just doesn't bark so anything would be an improvement but I'd like it to rattle the windows!!        

Thanks!!      
#2

(02-13-2015, 02:03 PM)bm071 Wrote:  Hello Everyone!

   Looking at the specs of the original transformer the primary resistance is 7600 ohms. The Edcor is 8K. My question is will the extra 400 ohms cause any major changes in tone or clarity? 

No it won't.

However, do make sure that this 8000 Ohms ARE at the Voice coil impedance of the speaker.

I do not remember wht the VC impedance but if say 8000 Ohm is at the VC=8 Ohm and you have VC=4 Ohm your input impedance will be 4000 Ohms then.
#3

The voice coil impedance of the 38-116 speaker is 3.9 ohms.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#4

Additionally:

The original audio output transformer is rated at 8000 ohms primary impedance.

The Edcor GXPP15-4-8K is a near perfect replacement - 8000 ohms to 4 ohms. Icon_thumbup
https://www.edcorusa.com/gxpp15-4-8k

Great price, too, compared to a Hammond equivalent. The only problem I see is mounting it to your speaker, since the Edcor does not mount in the same way as the original transformer. But I'm sure you can figure something out.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#5

The single problem that kept me fom ordering Edcor is they ave no stock, they build to order when they have enough.
Otherwise great looking good transformers with great price.
#6

(02-13-2015, 05:44 PM)morzh Wrote:  The single problem that kept me fom ordering Edcor is they ave no stock, they build to order when they have enough.
Otherwise great looking good transformers with great price.

Oh boy,, am I thinking wrong or totally screwed up? I am replacing the so called output transformer on the radio chassis. It's between the 6l6 and the 6j5 tube right behind the tuning condenser. Am I confused with the input transformer? My transformer on my 15 in speaker is Philco #32-7717N.  I was/am teaching myself how to read schematics and such and from what  I could conclude part #  32-7751 located on the back of the chassis.  I purchased this radio at an estate auction and the Hammond 124E(sorry I thought it wa sa 126 series) was a replacement located on the chassis as I described. I don't mind being wrong and thanks in advance for the correct info, I just would like to have the correct replacement parts.     
 
#7

No, no, that is the audio interstage transformer. The audio output transformer mounts on the speaker.

The interstage transformer is a totally different monster. And if it requires replacement, you will have to have one custom made or else find one from a junk 38-116 chassis. This transformer has two separate secondaries, not a center tap. The split secondaries are necessary because of the radio's design; a center-tapped secondary won't work without some modifications to the set's original design. And it is a step-down transformer.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#8

Ron

Hammond interstages do not work for 38-116? I mean, they do make those. I used one in my 111.
#9

Unless they make a step-down interstage with split secondaries (two separate secondaries, no center tap), then no.

The secondary of the 111's interstage has a center tap.

I recall someone had Heyboer make one of those for them. I don't remember if it was someone on the Phorum or elsewhere, but as I recall, the finished product was identical to the original and fit in the original shell.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#10

ok???? I guess the 124e is not the correct replacement for that however it plays with that transformer installed. Please tell me what I need to do to. If I need to have one buitl I think edcor will build to my specs.  Unfortunately now I am in over my head. Would you be able to provide me with specific/original build specs to have one made? Or any leads to a used one?
Thank you Ron for your time and trouble!!
#11

Yes, mine was with split secondaries, I connected them in series.

http://www.hammondmfg.com/pdf/5C_124_126.pdf
#12

The 124E won't work as it is a step-up transformer. The 38-116 wants a step-down transformer.

I do not have the impedances, but the primary DC resistance is 400 ohms. Secondary #1 is 175 ohms; secondary #2 is 150 ohms.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#13

Can you take 124E and invert it? It would become a centertapped stepdown, as I remember, 3:1
#14

(02-13-2015, 11:26 PM)Ron Ramirez Wrote:  The 124E won't work as it is a step-up transformer. The 38-116 wants a step-down transformer.

I do not have the impedances, but the primary DC resistance is 400 ohms. Secondary #1 is 175 ohms; secondary #2 is 150 ohms.

Thanks Ron...I may post on the board for a used one. Hopefully someone has a junk chassis. Guesss I could have ordered the Edcor xpp style transformer instead of the gxpp. My fault for not doing research. I tend to take the easiest path right or wrong!!
#15

http://www.nostalgiaair.org/Resources/235/M0013235.htm

Notice that each secondary has a 10K resistor in series with the two (separate) windings, and then each end of these resistors connect together and to B-.

Mike (morzh), I would bet that you could come up with an alternative method of biasing those 6L6G tubes while allowing the use of a center-tapped secondary. I'm not an engineer so I freely admit such reverse engineering is above my pay grade.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN




Users browsing this thread: 7 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
1930s Stewart-Warner Tombstone Radio need help identifying model number
Another Update: I found a couple of damaged coils inside this radio that might have something to do with why this radio ...captainclock1988 — 10:51 PM
6TPZ and 5TPO Radio Help
If you are still on 5TPO, you lost me there. What X7? What Points 1 and 2?morzh — 08:37 PM
6TPZ and 5TPO Radio Help
Quick progress report: X7 is broken. Only one leg soldered, the other missing and the diode is cracked. I've replaced...R3Sons — 05:05 PM
6TPZ and 5TPO Radio Help
Oh...and you have electrolytic caps there. All need to go and be replaced.morzh — 04:36 PM
6TPZ and 5TPO Radio Help
Thanks, will do.R3Sons — 01:25 PM
1930s Stewart-Warner Tombstone Radio need help identifying model number
UPDATE: I was able to pick up a signal generator on the cheap (amazingly enough) on feebay and I did an IF alignment fol...captainclock1988 — 09:53 AM
Philco 91 Schematic
Hi Rod, The resistor connects to pin 4 and the ungrounded side of block 9. From pin 9 of the RF tube to one side of ...dconant — 09:34 AM
Just got a 49-1613 need to know...everything!
I just found your post. I have this exact same model, and have had it since 1985 when I was 15 years old! I performed a ...MuzzcoVW — 09:11 AM
B&K 1077B no video
Hello Tim, I would if it's a leaky Capacitor So are all 3 of those B- voltages low then ? Sincerely Richardradiorich — 01:55 AM
B&K 1077B no video
I found a schematic and think I have the problem traced down to the minus power supply. I have very low voltages that go...TV MAN — 12:41 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>