Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

By-Passing defective audio & IF transformers with R/C
#1

originally written by Norm Leal:
A radio with defective audio interstage or intermediate freq transformer can often be repaired without replacing or rewinding the transformer. For many of us, it is difficult to find a replacement that fits. In case of the IF trans, the early radios did not standardize on a freq, and a exact replacement may be nearly impossible to find. The trans coupling can usually be replaced by capacitor/resistor coupling often without any loss of performance. In the case of Audio Interstage trans, connect a capacitor from the plate of the driving tube to the driven tube grid, the value is not critical. I suggest 0.1 mfd @ 400 v. Then, bypass the open winding with a resistor. Again, the value value is not critical. If the plate to B+ side is open, try using a 22k @ 1 watt. If the grid winding is open, a 100k 1/2 watt will work. I think you will be surprised @ the results. The freq resp will probably be better than orig circuit design.
You may do the same with IF trans also. With IF trans, use small caps between the plate of the driving tube to the grid of the driven tube. This will allow peaking of the 1-side of the trans which is still working. Caps around 200 pf will usually work. Again, the resistor value used to bypass the open winding is not critical. The same values used for AF circuits will work. I have suggested rather low resistance values so almost any circuit will work. In the case of tetrode types 24A, it is important to keep the plate voltage above the screen, and tubes like the triode 27 should also be used with fairly low plate resistors.
Thar ya go techs!! Bypass those bad trans, and no need to rewind, unless "originality" is paramount in your restorations,!!?? Icon_wink




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
91H Code 126 Restore
Well I'm making good progress. All the bakelite blocks have been recapped.  I found that using a heat gun and skinny ...RealRider — 02:35 PM
Philco model 60
>>and found that the field coil is bad. Should be 1140 ohms, tests at 1.1k ohms. You have one stringent crit...morzh — 02:07 PM
Philco model 60
Yes I was there. I got some real bargains there. Plus a Zenith 7G605 clipper that I have been trying to find for a fair ...Radios1340 — 01:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 3409 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 3408 Guest(s)
Avatar

>