Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

44B vs. 144B dial differences?
#1

I recently acquired a Philco 144B that has suffered a catastrophic dial cleaning.

I see that RadioDaze sells part# 27-5028 dial scale for the 44B, but they do not list part# 27-5044 dial scale for the 144B.

The band coverage listed in Riders is identical for both radios, on all 4 bands.

Can anyone tell me what the differences are between the two dials, and whether they are interchangeable?

Thanks!
Rodney
#2

That is a Bummer , maybe one turns up on the Bay or maybe a mark Oppat question, he has lots of parts? A wanted post on other forum maybe?

Paul

Tubetalk1
#3

I don't believe there is any difference, other than whether (or not) the dial is the same for the later 144s since they use a different tuning mechanism.

I have a 44B but no 144 to go by.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#4

Hi, that's a good point, Ron. Even though the markings are the same, the slot for the tuning shaft could be a different width. I hadn't thought of that.

I will have to pull it out of the cabinet this weekend and make some measurements. Thanks!
#5

Well, I just got back to this after a few weeks, and it looks like the dials are definitely different.

I think the hash marks and numerals for the different frequencies are identical between the 44 and 144.

However, the keyhole cutout for mounting the 144 dial appears to be much larger than than the keyhole for the 44B.  I measured it at 2.32" diameter as installed.

Also, while the freq. markings are the same, some of the ancillary markings are different from those shown at Radio Daze.  For instance, in the 11.5 - 12.0 MHz range, the 44 dial says "SW Broadcast."  The 144 dial says "-------- SW ---------".  Some of the ship, amateur, phone markings are not on the 144 dial at all.


Attached Files Image(s)
   




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
91H Code 126 Restore
Well I'm making good progress. All the bakelite blocks have been recapped.  I found that using a heat gun and skinny ...RealRider — 02:35 PM
Philco model 60
>>and found that the field coil is bad. Should be 1140 ohms, tests at 1.1k ohms. You have one stringent crit...morzh — 02:07 PM
Philco model 60
Yes I was there. I got some real bargains there. Plus a Zenith 7G605 clipper that I have been trying to find for a fair ...Radios1340 — 01:46 PM
The speaker table error?
G  10-1/2"       65, 76, 87, 95 Push-Pull 45's 2766 0.7 550 3200 H   10-1/2"    77, 96 Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>