Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Checking XXL tubes
#1

I have 7 XXL tubes, and all but 1 check bad, the one had no filament, so I know it’s bad. But all the others check bad on my Jackson 648s. Some of my other tubes check goo, but not the XXL tubes, but they all check at 30 and 40. Is this normal?

Philco 41-295X 4 band radio.
I'm 67 years old, in north Idaho.
#2

On my 41-300 both of the xxl's were weak/unusable. Poor performance @ the low end of the bcb.

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry
#3

Hi Nortonz!

A Jackson 648 is an emission style tester, so if those tubes don't pass the emission test on the 648, they are probably bad.  However, the best way to know for SURE is to put them in a working radio and compare the performance of the radio.  Both R.L. Drake and Collins radio suggested that method to be SURE that the tube was indeed bad.  I wouldn't pitch the XXL's until I had a working set to plug them in to, so as to make a definite determination.  BTW, if memory serves, an XXL is the same as a 7A4.  But that is the only other sub for an XXL.

Kim Herron W8ZV
w8zv at goldenradioservice.com
1-616-677-3706
#4

That’s my plan, I have three 37’s on order, when they com in for my 41-295, I will try them to know for sure. BTW your memory serves you well the 7A4 is the only sub for a XXL.

Philco 41-295X 4 band radio.
I'm 67 years old, in north Idaho.




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
462ron
Hi Mike, that 84 sure looks great. You don’t often see these antique radios with a fuse like yours has. I usually instal...462ron — 10:22 AM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Hello Mike, Wow ! far as my AK it does work and the cabinet is in nice shape so is my chassis anyway here is a photo of...radiorich — 02:59 AM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Nice radio, Mike! Here's hoping it was well rebuilt. Take care and BE HEALTHY! GaryGarySP — 12:12 AM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Rich yes, this is the way I got it. I have just put it on the table and took it apart. I suspect it even might work,...morzh — 11:31 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Hello mike, What nice looking radio I have one AK in my collection it's a console I have not started restoring it yet ....radiorich — 11:21 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
Just to make it more confusing here is another model 91 schematic that doesn't show parts with dotted lines in that spot...Arran — 10:37 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
The wires were desoldered from the can, and the capacitors checked. All checked at 0.102 uF, which is correct. So the c...morzh — 09:41 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Arran Yours probably then the H speaker, same as mine.morzh — 08:39 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike; I would like to have a look at the speaker in my model 96, but the set is packed into a corner in the basement. ...Arran — 08:04 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
Thanks Arran, I'm convinced the power cord is good but have a nice repro plug for it. Would it be prudent to add a fus...RealRider — 07:28 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 4815 online users. [Complete List]
» 2 Member(s) | 4813 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatar

>