1. The PHILCO Phorum
  2. Philco Radio Discussions
  3. Philco Electronic Restoration

Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Threaded Mode
Two More Questions on Philco bakelite caps and values
jerryhawthorne
Phorum Expert
*****
Posts: 1,562
Threads: 56
Joined: Nov 2008
City: Sedona, AZ/Placentia/CA
#1

11-01-2011, 04:36 PM
Working my way through a Philco 19 code 126 and noticed two discrepancies on sealed caps.
1. Cap labeled "4989W" indicated in the Philco workbench reference material as a .09mfd and 200ohm unit, is shown in the code 126 schematic (item 5) as a .09 and 300ohm package. On the code 121 it is shown as a .09 and 200ohm. Go with the 200 ohm?

2. Cap labeled "8174B" indicated in the Philco workbench reference material as a 700pf and .05mfd unit is shown in the code 126 and code 121 schematics (item 8) as a 700pf and .09mfd. Not certain which I should go with on this one. Any suggestions?

Sorry for the "funny face" on item 2, should be an 8 but keeps coming up that way!
Thanks for your help, Jerry
A friend in need is a pest!  Bill Slee ca 1970.
Find
Radioroslyn
Phorum Expert
*****
Posts: 7,294
Threads: 268
Joined: Dec 2009
City: Roslyn Pa
#2

11-01-2011, 11:04 PM
I'd go with the 200 ohm and the 700mmfd and .09/.1
With bypass caps always go larger.
Terry
When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry
Find
jerryhawthorne
Phorum Expert
*****
Posts: 1,562
Threads: 56
Joined: Nov 2008
City: Sedona, AZ/Placentia/CA
#3

11-02-2011, 02:07 PM
As usual, thanks for the response Terry. Shall go with the .1 and 200 ohm.
Jerry
A friend in need is a pest!  Bill Slee ca 1970.
Find
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Thread Closed




Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM
Philco model 60
I'm also a member of MARC. Did you attend the Vintage Electronics Expo in Waterford, MI last month? That's where I got...GarySP — 07:22 PM
A Marconi model 86
Dan Double conversion is using two IF converters instead of one. This improves the image response. morzh — 07:15 PM
A Marconi model 86
Thanks Arran; I don't even know what a double conversion is, but i do have a good friend In Nova Scotia that would k...Dan Walker — 07:01 PM
A Marconi model 86
Dan; I've seen some Marconi sets like that before, one was a console though I'm not sure if it was a model 86. It's a...Arran — 05:09 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Milkjug plastic? Whatever is chosen for the spider, the material must be compatible with popular adhesives... Th...Chas — 05:05 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike; I would not use plastic from a milk jug for a spider, first it's polyethylene/polypropylene which resists most ...Arran — 04:56 PM
Philco model 60
This is my thread on 60 from 2016. I had to rewind the osc coil, and I actually counted the turns and then rewound i...morzh — 03:34 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 3823 online users. [Complete List]
» 2 Member(s) | 3821 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatar

>
  1. The PHILCO Phorum
  2. Philco Radio Discussions
  3. Philco Electronic Restoration